CA Public Safety Committee Approves Senate Bill 680

Source: ACSOL

The Assembly’s Public Safety Committee today approved an amended version of Senate Bill (SB) 680, which if enacted, would require individuals convicted of statutory rape to register for 10 years.  Unlike the original version of the bill, the current version of SB 680 would not be applied retroactively.  Instead, the bill would apply only to those convicted of PC 261.5 on or after January 1, 2026.

During today’s hearing, four board members and three members of ACSOL testified in opposition to the bill.  Also testifying in opposition to SB 680 were representatives of the California Public Defenders Association (CPDA) and Initiate Justice.  

Passage of SB 680 would undermine the Tiered Registry Bill and its considerable progress, according to the CPDA spokesperson.  She added that there would be collateral impacts upon those required to register as well as members of their families. Further, she stated that individuals required to register under this bill would not be able to visit 31 states where the age of consent is less than 18 years old.  

Senate Bill 680 is legal overreach that won’t make society any safer, according to the Initiate Justice representative.  She added increasing punishment for those convicted of a sex offense will not reduce in the future incidents of sexual abuse.

Senator Susan Rubio, author of SB 680, stated during the hearing that she found the testimony of both organizations “offensive.”  She added that victims need time in court in order to punish their perpetrators.

In his closing statement made during the hearing, Public Safety Committee Chairman Nick Schultz acknowledged that enforcement of SB 680 could be costly.  He added that consideration of those costs would be addressed during a future hearing of the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee.  

It has been reported that the budget for the State of California has a shortfall of $12 billion.  If the Appropriations Committee does not approve SB 680, the bill will be terminated.

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

There’s always going to be one politician that thinks they can fix everything wrong in society by “allowing the victim to get retributuion”. Pathetic excuse for a person.

She added that victims need time in court in order to punish their perpetrators.”

so…..you just admitted the registry IS punishment!?!?

these people in the state government dont give a sh*t they are jacka**es plain and simple they wonder why a registry costs them so much because they keep pushing and approving bs laws then they complain it costs them a lot, good the more cost the better… the more overbloated the registry is the better it just shows thier bs and ignorance. just imagine how many bs garbage laws will be on the books in another 50 years… only way the registry will fully go away is for a civil war to happen.

Just think of how much worse this bill would be if not for ACSOL and Janice constantly beating the drum. It would be retroactive-city once again.

Thank you again, Janice, for all your help, education and support. A lot of people dodged a bullet, although a Tier 1 assignment would allow life to go on normally, for the most part. I’m glad to see the legislature finally spare some of us from retroactive requirements.

I see that the Appropriations Committee is now holding all the cards again. What poetic justice it would be if they could demand that some or all of the CASOMB recommendations be added, to save money.

If 261.5 is in tier 1 why is 288(c) in tier 3? It’s the same crime somebody make this make sense? 288(c) should be in tier 1 as well

So… THIS registerable offense is not retroactive, but others are? Why? ? ?

Sentence for the offense = Punishment?

Does anyone else smell another equal protection violation, or is that just me?

Just wondering how on earth we are ever going to keep the public safe if we don’t register EVERYONE!

After all, they are highly likely to keep doing this illegal act being that the recidivism rate is so “frightening and high” based on The Supreme Court’s precious Lie to the world!

They should be so ashamed of themselves for the devastating destruction they have caused for millions of people in this country, that they are supposed to work for!

How do these so-called justices sleep at night knowing they have abused our constitution to ruin the lives of so many precious children?

Pure EVIL!